(a) Admissibility of Evidence. The experts preparing the reports may be called by either party or the court, and additional evidence may be introduced by either party. The experts appointed by the court are deemed court witnesses whether called by the court or either party and may be examined as such by either party.
(b) Finding of Competence. The court must first consider the issue of the defendant’s competence to proceed. If the court finds the defendant competent to proceed, the court must enter its order so finding and proceed.
(c) Commitment on Finding of Incompetence. If the court finds the defendant is incompetent to proceed, or that the defendant is competent to proceed but that the defendant’s competence depends on the continuation of appropriate treatment for a mental illness or intellectual disability, the court must consider issues relating to treatment necessary to restore or maintain the defendant’s competence to proceed.
(1) The court may order the defendant to undergo treatment if the court finds that the defendant is mentally ill or intellectually disabled and is in need of treatment and that treatment appropriate for the defendant’s condition is available. If the court finds that the defendant may be treated in the community on bail or other release conditions, the court may make acceptance of reasonable medical treatment a condition of continuing bail or other release conditions.
(2) If the defendant is incarcerated, the court may order treatment to be administered at the custodial facility or may order the defendant transferred to another facility for treatment or may commit the defendant as provided in subdivision (3).
(3) A defendant may be committed for treatment to restore a defendant’s competence to proceed if the court finds that:
(A) the defendant meets the criteria for commitment as set forth by statute;
(B) there is a substantial probability that the mental illness or intellectual disability causing the defendant’s incompetence will respond to treatment and that the defendant will regain competency to proceed in the reasonably foreseeable future;
(C) treatment appropriate for restoration of the defendant’s competence to proceed is available;
(D) no appropriate treatment alternative less restrictive than that involving commitment is available; and
(E) other mental health services, treatment services, support services, and case management services as described in section 394.67, Florida Statutes, would be inappropriate.
(4) If the court commits the defendant, the order of commitment must contain:
(A) findings of fact relating to the issues of competency and commitment addressing the factors set forth in rule 3.211 when applicable;
(B) copies of the reports of the experts filed with the court under the order of examination;
(C) copies of any other psychiatric, psychological, or social work reports submitted to the court relative to the mental state of the defendant; and
(D) copies of the charging instrument and all supporting affidavits or other documents used in the determination of probable cause.
(5) Before issuing a commitment order, the court must review the examining expert’s report to ensure alternative treatment options have been fully considered and found insufficient to meet the needs of the defendant.
(6) The treatment facility must admit the defendant for hospitalization and treatment and may retain and treat the defendant. No later than 60 days from the date of admission, the administrator of the facility must file with the court a report that addresses the issues and considers the factors set forth in rule 3.211, with copies to all parties. If, at any time during the 60 day period or during any period of extended commitment that may be ordered under this rule, the administrator of the facility determines that the defendant no longer meets the criteria for commitment or has become competent to proceed, the administrator must notify the court by such a report, with copies to all parties.
(A) If, during the 60 day period of commitment and treatment or during any period of extended commitment that may be ordered under this rule, counsel for the defendant must have reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant is competent to proceed or no longer meets the criteria for commitment, counsel may move for a hearing on the issue of the defendant’s competence or commitment. The motion must contain a certificate of counsel that the motion is made in good faith and on reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant is now competent to proceed or no longer meets the criteria for commitment. To the extent that it does not invade the attorney-client privilege, the motion must contain a recital of the specific observations of and conversations with the defendant that have formed the basis for the motion.
(B) If, on consideration of a motion filed by counsel for the defendant or the prosecuting attorney and any information offered the court in support thereof, the court has reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant may have regained competence to proceed or no longer meets the criteria for commitment, the court must order the administrator of the facility to report to the court on such issues, with copies to all parties, and must order a hearing to be held on those issues.
(7) The court must hold a hearing within 30 days of the receipt of the report from the administrator of the facility. If, following the hearing, the court determines that the defendant continues to be incompetent to proceed and that the defendant meets the criteria for continued commitment or treatment, the court must order continued commitment or treatment for a period not to exceed 1 year. When the defendant is retained by the facility, the same procedure must be repeated prior to the expiration of each additional 1–year period of extended commitment.
(8) If, at any time after such commitment, the court decides, after hearing, that the defendant is competent to proceed, it shall enter its order so finding and shall proceed.
(9) If, after any such hearing, the court determines that the defendant remains incompetent to proceed but no longer meets the criteria for commitment, the court shall proceed as provided in rule 3.212(d).
(d) Release on Finding of Incompetence. If the court decides that a defendant is not mentally competent to proceed and there is a substantial probability that the defendant will gain competency to proceed in the foreseeable future, but does not meet the criteria for commitment, the defendant may be released on appropriate release conditions. The court may order that the defendant receive outpatient treatment at an appropriate local facility and that the defendant report for further evaluation at specified times during the release period as conditions of release. A report must be filed with the court after each evaluation by the persons appointed by the court to make such evaluations, with copies to all parties. The procedure for determinations of the confidential status of reports is governed by Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.420. If a defendant is found to be mentally incompetent to proceed and there is no substantial probability that the defendant will gain competency to proceed in the foreseeable future, the defendant must be released, or the State must initiate civil commitment proceedings.